Scarlet Letters, The Journal of Femmerotica, Solo Sex
Safe Sex: The Public Variety | Heather Corinna
Every few months, in order to keep my media current and make sure things are under control, I spend a day going through multiple search engines on the web to find all of my recent press and mentions that I may not have been notified of.

And every time I do so, I get a little more terrified, because every time I do, I find something new that is a bit scarier than the last thing I found

Lest you think I'm being overly pessimistic, there are certainly good things to find out there, or at the very least, harmless things. I discovered that Scarleteen, for instance, is in a listing from Media Metrix of the Top 9 sites for teens to watch, which was impressive since all the other sites on the list were corporate. I discovered a fairly mixed review of an anthology I had a story in last year in which the reviewer nixed most pieces, but had great things to say about my work. I discovered that all three of my sites are now routinely in top ten lists for their genre, and usually at the top of those lists. I found numerous link lists for public libraries that linked my sites as recommended choices. God bless librarians.

With some embarrassment, I found a catty little snippet I sniped at the political magazine Gridlock and Load last year about Monica Lewinsky's knitting bag company. I didn't mean to be insensitive, I just felt there would be more value in Hillary Clinton's Divorce Files Attaché. Really.

I found a mini-review of Scarlet Letters at Blue Food that I couldn't discern as a compliment or an insult, something which happens to me fairly often, which included the snippet: "Porn luminary Heather Corinna has cornered the market on self-exploiting websites with universal appeal." If you can tell me what that means, you're a better linguist than I.

But all of those positive or benign things (if they are positive and benign, and if I can't tell the difference, I suppose it doesn't matter much) rarely override the negatives.

I discovered mention of me as a friend at three different online journals. That would be lovely, except that I had absolutely no idea who any of those people were, and one of them appears to be threatening suicide. It's very difficult to know how to react to that when you've no idea who that person was, and what their relationship to you was, if it existed outside of their heads at all.

I discovered a newsreel some months back that had listed a whole piece about our demise with Verio in 1998, who unceremoniously dumped us after one month of service because they had changed their policy on sexuality. Verio had also lied and said our site had been hacked, which we called them on when we checked our logs. They got quiet and let us take our time finding another host. But I've no idea how this newsreel got hold of that little tidbit, nor why it was very important.

But those bits are minor.

I discovered several articles scattered in different places that seemed to be cut and basted (and yes, I do mean basted) from one original article at a conservative right family group, discussing the STD risks of oral sex, which something I go on about in Scarleteen enough that the kids want to tape my mouth shut to keep from hearing it one more time. However, they had added commentary from me about oral sex neither being sinful nor "nasty," plugged it as advice I give small children, and plastered it over a photo of my face as if it were a Wanted poster. I expected to see a price hovering over my head. I was completely mortified. My partner was beyond mortified.

Were I talking to young children, as I did for years, you can rest assured that if Johnny's hand was in someone's pants that were not his, I wouldn't be talking to him about oral sex. I'd be talking to him about boundaries and staying in his own pants.

But I digress. On some level, when one is doing controversial work, it is a testament to your effectiveness if you piss people off who oppose what you're doing. On the other hand, you can't very well keep doing what you're doing well if you feel you need to leave the house with a bag over your head.

I don't want friends I've never met, spoken to, or heard of talking about me colloquially. I don't want my small business hassles to become news. And I certainly don't want to become Public Enemy #562 with the conservative right wing. Obviously, this poses a massive conflict, because I do want to continue the work that I do, which if I do it well, is going to get masses of attention. If I'm not going to do it well, there is little sense in doing it at all. But is it safe -- on a multitude of levels -- to be doing public sex work in a media that is as unregulated, global and immediate as the Internet is? And can you really succeed at it as an individual without your presence becoming widespread?

The funny thing is this: I have come across people (and often by means which are less than friendly) who wanted to be me. I have met people who are jealous of me. I have met young women who aspire to be like me, scary as that is. Yet, very few people want to do exactly what I am doing in the way that I am doing it, in other words, independently, without the protection of some larger company, organization, or without a pseudonym or a high level of anonymity.

Scarleteen, for instance, is only one of a handful of sites addressing teens and sexuality, as is the highest ranking site of its kind. I don't think that is because no one else CAN do it. I think it is because no one else wants to. And I'm not sure I blame them.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not anything close to hanging up my hat. However, I am wary, and this issue puts me at odds with what I am trying to do, and makes me wonder how far it can go before it's too much for me to handle.

The Internet is a medium that a good many people find threatening. Sexuality has always been something that scares a lot of people do death. A ballsy, blunt, and independent woman who makes her living talking intelligently but not clinically about sex, and doesn't have any of the "disqualifiers" which make it easier for the mainstream to dismiss her -- namely, being unattractive, too old, a lesbian, funded too well, too stupid or having a need to be nice at all times -- is either scary or infuriating as far as many people are concerned. I round this out by working with teenagers as well as adults. I feel it can go without saying that I am also a masochist.

I have no idea how to rectify this. There are very few laws when it comes to internet harassment or stalking, and those really don't apply in a situation like this, anyway. One cannot court fame, or reach a broad audience without these sorts of byproducts. In addition, as our agent gets closer to getting us a deal on a book for Scarleteen, I get a little more terrified. That's a lie. I'm a lot more terrified, and the scary part is that I am often more private than other colleagues of mine. For instance, I have a bucket full of worries I have heaped upon friends like Jane Duvall because they run webcams in which anyone out there can see them candidly -- as they look on the street and in their homes -- at all times. My business partner and friend Hanne Blank does constant public readings and seminars all over the place. Others I know are in constant fear they will lose their day jobs (and a good deal have), put their families in danger, or be unable to gain credibility in other areas in which they excel. It may sound like paranoia, but because most of it is based in actual experience, I'm inclined to believe that it is valid. If we weren't at least a little scared about it, we'd be kidding ourselves.

I know it is best not to admit to this fear, because perhaps I am supposed to be fearful in reacting to some of these sorts of things. I am fearful, I am cautious. But that doesn't fix much.

When I first had an astrological reading done in high school, the reader told me I was going to have one hell of a hard time in my life, because I liked to caress and stroke with my hands the things most people refuse to touch at all. I am not alone in this. Most of the people I am close to, and the colleagues I work with most often are the same way. It makes us brilliant. It makes us noticeable. It makes some of us famous. It also often can make us more famous as targets of hate or of fear than of recognition or praise. Though no one buys our products, per se, we still daily field unsolicited input, some of which is often downright scary.

There is no incredibly clever summation to be had this week when it comes to this issue, at least not on my part. I have neither the answers, nor the resolution. I have, instead, a persistent and nagging worry that at some point I won't be able to do what I do and live some semblance of a healthy, safe and enjoyable life. And when what I do is solely to encourage and empower others to have that sort of a life, it strikes me as the most terrible sort of irony.


Copyright 2000, Heather Corinna. All rights reserved.
talk about it at the forums | wenches of yesteryear | home